networking-forum.com
Community BlogCommunity Wiki * Register  * Search  * Login
View unanswered postsView active topics

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 1:54 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 294
Location: On a fretboard
Certs: Pimp status
I need to update my asa from 8.2(3) to whatever the next stable version is. I know some people where having issues with the 8.3 releases. Is 8.4 looking good for everyone?

_________________
thelostpackets.blogspot.com - randomness from the bit bucket


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 1:57 pm 
Offline
Post Whore
Post Whore

Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 7:38 pm
Posts: 1802
8.4.2 has been good for me.
Just be aware that after 8.2, the NAT config changes.

_________________
http://networking.ventrefamily.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 2:11 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 6:09 pm
Posts: 498
Location: Portland, OR
8.4.2 has been ok for us as well. I believe the consensus is to upgrade from 8.2 -> 8.3 -> 8.4

See this thread: http://www.networking-forum.com/viewtopic.php?t=26620


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 2:18 pm 
Offline
Post Whore
Post Whore
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 2:15 pm
Posts: 8459
Location: Frederick MD
Certs: Instanity
running 8.4(3) here with no issues, for about a week now.

_________________
"If you're good at anticipating the human mind. It leaves nothing to chance."
-Jigsaw


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 2:18 pm 
Offline
Post Whore
Post Whore
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:16 pm
Posts: 1375
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Certs: CCNP, CCNA:Sec, MCSE
I have lots of ASAs running 8.2(5)13 ; technically that's after 8.2(3) :-)

_________________
"A problem well stated is a problem half solved". (Charles Kettering)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 2:32 pm 
Offline
Post Whore
Post Whore
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2007 2:15 pm
Posts: 8459
Location: Frederick MD
Certs: Instanity
Dinger wrote:
I have lots of ASAs running 8.2(5)13 ; technically that's after 8.2(3) :-)



8.2(5)22 is out since January, previous interium was the 8.2(5)13

mlan, technically, the recommended upgrade process is is
8.2 -> last stable release in 8.2 train -> 8.3 -> last stable release in 8.3 train -> 8.4 -> latest 8.4 release.

but then again I went directly from 8.0(5) to 8.4(1)51 with no issues.

_________________
"If you're good at anticipating the human mind. It leaves nothing to chance."
-Jigsaw


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 2:52 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:38 am
Posts: 9439
Location: Orlando, FL
Certs: CCNP RS, CCNP DC, CCDP, CCIP
8.4(3) has been good for me

_________________
http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 3:40 pm 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:42 pm
Posts: 199
Certs: CCIE R&S
I got a copy of 8.4(2)-5 from TAC that has been rock solid. So i am figuring that 8.4(3) is fine.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 4:07 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 10:38 am
Posts: 9439
Location: Orlando, FL
Certs: CCNP RS, CCNP DC, CCDP, CCIP
willroute4food wrote:
I got a copy of 8.4(2)-5 from TAC that has been rock solid. So i am figuring that 8.4(3) is fine.


What issue were you hitting on 8.4(2)?

_________________
http://blog.alwaysthenetwork.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:14 pm 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 4:42 pm
Posts: 199
Certs: CCIE R&S
Honestly we were having some issues where the configuration wasnt loading right after a reboot. It would parse valid lines out of the config. You could manually reinsert them though. It was quite strange.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:21 pm 
Offline
Post Whore
Post Whore
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2008 2:16 pm
Posts: 1375
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Certs: CCNP, CCNA:Sec, MCSE
ristau5741 wrote:

8.2(5)22 is out since January, previous interium was the 8.2(5)13


careful using 8.2(5)22; it crashes the standby unit upon booting. See viewtopic.php?t=29501 for more info.

_________________
"A problem well stated is a problem half solved". (Charles Kettering)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:24 pm 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 3:28 pm
Posts: 213
Certs: CCSP/CCNP:Security GIAC GPEN
The majority of my clients firewalls are on 8.4.2 and we haven't had any issues. Various configurations of 5510's and 5505's.

_________________
The Cubicle Wizard
http://cubiclewizard.blogspot.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 12:50 am 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:46 pm
Posts: 372
Location: USA
Certs: CCNA R&S/Security, IPS Specialist, 642-642
I'm curious, what is the reasoning for upgrading in increments instead of from 8.2 straight to 8.4?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 11, 2012 5:39 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:43 pm
Posts: 294
Location: On a fretboard
Certs: Pimp status
Thanks for the replies everyone.

I was having issues configuring anyconnect for voip and I thought it was because of my version. Turns out, tac sent me config example for a router and not asa which is why the commands didnt match up. Specifically crypto ca vs crypto pki.

_________________
thelostpackets.blogspot.com - randomness from the bit bucket


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:23 pm 
Offline
New Member
New Member

Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 3:13 pm
Posts: 7
Location: Austin, TX
Certs: CCENT
michoudi wrote:
I'm curious, what is the reasoning for upgrading in increments instead of from 8.2 straight to 8.4?


8.2 to 8.3 is considered a major upgrade, something with the restructuring of the NAT configurations. I just upgraded one of our ASA's from 8.2 to 8.3. We've been running it for about 3 months now without any issues from what I can tell. I'm in the process now of upgrading our second ASA which we are running the CAC VPN on, that was a pain to duplicate on the replacement ASA but a sense of accomplishment when it finally worked! :dance:

It seems we will be holding off on the 8.4 upgrade until it has been out for a bit.

I've only been in the networking game since the end of 2009 and I only have a CCENT so take it however :)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 5:55 pm 
Offline
New Member
New Member

Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2012 3:13 pm
Posts: 7
Location: Austin, TX
Certs: CCENT
michoudi wrote:
I'm curious, what is the reasoning for upgrading in increments instead of from 8.2 straight to 8.4?



Here are the release notes for 8.3
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/securit ... arn83.html

•NAT redesign.

•Real IP addresses in access rules instead of mapped addresses.

•Named network objects and service objects.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exstart, MrPhreak and 21 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group