networking-forum.com
Community BlogCommunity Wiki * Register  * Search  * Login
View unanswered postsView active topics

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Subnetting
PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 2:36 pm 
Offline
CCIE #38070
CCIE #38070
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 7:49 am
Posts: 12425
Location: London, UK
Certs: CCIE ,CC-NP/IP, JNCIP-SP, JNCIS-ENT, BC-/SPNE/NP
baybars wrote:
I think subnetting (especially subnetting fast) is an overrated skill. It's just basic mathematics, and outside the exam environment, you don't need to do it fast, unless you're trying to impress someone. Just give it a minute, a pen and a paper; no need to rush.


QFT

Too true

What really matters in real life is getting it done properly, not quickly. It's not like it's going to take you a week

_________________
www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subnetting
PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 3:10 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 3:04 pm
Posts: 380
Location: San Diego, CA
Subnetting rocked my arse when I took the ICND1. That subnetting workbook came in handy. You should definitely run through that book a couple times Scottsee. You can Google for the Teachers edition so you can check your work. But keep it only for that reason.

All in all, you just have to practice, practice, practice as I'm sure you know. Practice makes perfect. I really hate saying that though because subnetting practice can get boring and brain jello inflicting when you start dealing with crazy subnets.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subnetting
PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 10:25 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member

Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:29 pm
Posts: 67
Certs: College (BSC), A+, Net+
mellowd wrote:
baybars wrote:
I think subnetting (especially subnetting fast) is an overrated skill. It's just basic mathematics, and outside the exam environment, you don't need to do it fast, unless you're trying to impress someone. Just give it a minute, a pen and a paper; no need to rush.


QFT

Too true

What really matters in real life is getting it done properly, not quickly. It's not like it's going to take you a week


I totally agree! And speed is only for the exam! At work or building networks U have enough time to figure out subnetting! So if U already good at it then it becomes butter!
lol
:cheers:

_________________
LEARN WELL, PRACTICE, PRACTICE, PRACTICE!!

BELIEVE, TRUST YOURSELF n ACHIEVE! ~


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subnetting
PostPosted: Sat Nov 13, 2010 12:34 am 
Offline
Post Whore
Post Whore
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 17, 2008 6:44 pm
Posts: 6048
Location: Perth, WA
Certs: CCNA
scottsee wrote:
Project2501 wrote:
IP Addressing and Subnet Workbook Student Version 1.5

I preferred something to write out. Save trees and all that but it helped me.


Wow, great link, that's a whole lot of subnetting! :cheers:


It kind of is. I did this twice before my ICND1 and once before my ICND2. Practice makes perfect :)

_________________
- Pete


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subnetting
PostPosted: Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:42 pm 
Offline
New Member
New Member

Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 12:12 pm
Posts: 1
Certs: CCNA, A+, Net+
Some sort of calculating math is going to be required until you have this down to a science.

I've figured out subnetting by taking the block size from the subnets CIDR and dividing the host part of the IP address by the block size. Then multiply the block size by the sum to get the subnet address.

If I need to figure out the subnet for 10.99.185.236/20
I know that a /20 is a block size of 16.
185 divided by 16 = 11.5625 or simply 11
16 x 11 = 176
The subnet address is 10.99.176.0
176 + 16 = 192
The broadcast address is 10.99.191.255 which is 1 address less than the next subnet 10.99.192.0.

I started writing out counting in the different block sizes and found common reference points to help hop along, like 10's. A block size of 8 if I'm looking for a subnet in the 200's 8x20=160 and 8x30=240. After that picking up the count is a little easier.

The valid hosts and subnet values can be easily figured by mastering your powers of 2 table.
A /20 is always going to have a 2 to the 12th calculating the host portion and a 2 to the 4th calculating the subnet portion (of course - 2). If you build a table that combines your CIDR, subnet mask, block size increment and powers of 2 values you'll engrain a cheat sheet in your head that can help you master subnetting in your head.

Some of the binary solutions were confusing to me and take way too long to convert. I am nowhere near as quick as I'd like to be, but even the best in the business use subnet calculators to figure out this stuff. When your troubleshooting a problem, you'd best have this down so you can get answers quick and be able to correct a mistake in addressing that someone else might make.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Subnetting
PostPosted: Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:20 am 
Offline
Post Whore
Post Whore
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 10:26 pm
Posts: 2512
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Besides resurrecting a thread almost a year old I don't think that I understand anything that you've posted :shock:
ordabis wrote:
I've figured out subnetting by taking the block size from the subnets CIDR and dividing the host part of the IP address by the block size. Then multiply the block size by the sum to get the subnet address.
Seriously!
ordabis wrote:
If I need to figure out the subnet for 10.99.185.236/20
I know that a /20 is a block size of 16.
/20 means that the first 20 bits are the network portion of the address. That leaves 12 bits in the host portion of which up to 8 of the highest order can be used to increase the prefix to create subnets.
What's "block size" mean?
ordabis wrote:
I started writing out counting in the different block sizes and found common reference points to help hop along, like 10's. A block size of 8 if I'm looking for a subnet in the 200's 8x20=160 and 8x30=240. After that picking up the count is a little easier.
Easier for whom?
ordabis wrote:
The valid hosts and subnet values can be easily figured by mastering your powers of 2 table.
A /20 is always going to have a 2 to the 12th calculating the host portion and a 2 to the 4th calculating the subnet portion (of course - 2).
Totally baffling I'm afraid :?: And you do not subtract 2 from the number of subnets, you subtract 2 from the number of addresses.
ordabis wrote:
If you build a table that combines your CIDR, subnet mask, block size increment and powers of 2 values you'll engrain a cheat sheet in your head that can help you master subnetting in your head.

Some of the binary solutions were confusing to me and take way too long to convert.
Not for me. I find the that doing the binary conversion is straightforward - why learn another complex method?

Hmm, ok, maybe I might get what your saying - if you assume a Class C network with a /20 then you have 4 subnet bits that gives you 16 subnets - is that what you mean by "block size"??

The only problem with that is default classful addressing disappeared from the CCNA in 2004/2005 and these days is just a historic relic from another era.

Aubrey

_________________
The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. Alvin Toffler, "Future Shock" 1970


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group