RIP, EIGRP, OSPF, IS-IS, BGP, MPLS, VTP, STP.
Phenom01
Member
Posts:
139
Joined:
Thu Jun 16, 2011 10:30 am
Certs:
A+

Is this correct?>

Sat Jun 09, 2012 9:39 pm

192.168.0.1 255.255.0.0? I thought that class c subnet mask go never be less than 255.255.255.0

Fred
Post Whore
Posts:
2566
Joined:
Sat Jun 07, 2008 11:06 am
Certs:
CCNP, CCDP

Re: Is this correct?>

Sat Jun 09, 2012 9:52 pm

Forget class. You can subnet and supernet any way you want.

User avatar
stamour547
Senior Member
Posts:
369
Joined:
Fri Sep 25, 2009 2:28 pm
Certs:
A+, Network+, CCENT, CCNA

Re: Is this correct?>

Sun Jun 10, 2012 6:59 am

Fred is right, classful addressing really isn't used anymore. Pretty much all addresses are just the numbers that you see. Maybe it's just me but once you get your head around classless addressing it's easier as every address is treated like any other address.

'

Return to Cisco Routing and Switching

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Exabot [Bot], ggnf000, Google [Bot] and 31 guests